SGO SINCE 1975 __________ TOUCHSTONE COMMITTEE ___________ SINCE 1975 SGO: BICKLE FAMILY : Assertion Of Traditional Property Governance : Consecutively Settled Sovereign Peoples (CSSP) : Restitution Of LANDS XXII

2022 A.D.E. SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST A.D.E. 2022

May 11th

1 - 2 - 3 - 4

Good Day, Kathy & Cec Bickle : Hon Absolute Monarchs : Snuneymuxw Territories : Since Time Began

cc : CANADA / BC / UN

cc : International Human Rights Legal Counsels (GLCs)

Thank You For Your Call Today In These Continued Peace Trust And Friendship (Gus Wen Tah) Discussions With Snuneymuxw Council.

In Response To The Most Recent Email From Snuneymuxw Band, The Following Points Might Be Offered Forward To Assist The Band In Rationalizing This Matter Of Ownership Of Your Family Lands In Question : FIRST NATIONS BAND LAND : CANADA LAW ; SNUNEYMUXW

(A) BICKLE FAMILY HEADS (Head Of State) KATHY & CECIL Currently Are The Sole Source Of Law Within Your Traditional Territory

(B) Your AUTHORITY Derives Through Custom & Tradition - INHERITED Governing Duty Of Care

(D) Therefore, Snuneymuxw First Nations Has Not Accepted Crown Canada Jurisdiction - Or, Jurisdiction of The Indian Act - Nor, Snuneymuxw Band Council Authority To Universally SEIZE Personal Property Into "BAND LAND"

(C) The "Band Land" Concept Is Adopted In Treaty Negotiations As A Strategy To AVOID Settling Treaty TERMS & CONDITIONS With EACH INDIGENOUS FAMILY PERSON

(D) Evidence From Historical Canada Indigenous Peoples Numbered Treaty Agreement Is Exemplified In The Kwa'mutsun Cowichan Review ( The Reference IMAGE Is Attached Here For Your GUIDE

(E) Also, Canada Indian Act BCR References Are Attached

(F) PARAMOUNTCY : Standing First In Right Of Law : BICKLE Family Territorial Governance Has Not Been Abandoned, Diminished Through Free Prior Informed Consent

CANADA INDIAN ACT : BAND LAND - Not Defined Within The ACT : PUBLIC OVERVIEW : LOCATEE : CERTIFICATE OF POSSESSION : BAND LAND
IMPORTANT : What Agreement Exists Between BICKLE FAMILY Sovereign Property Rights Being Surrendered To Canada Snuneymuxw First Nations ?
BICKLE PROPERTY RIGHTS : Customs & Traditions : Consecutively Settled Sovereign Peoples Since 14.400 Years Ago (At Least 6000 Years Ago)
Whose Law Prevailed Where Canada Snuneymuxw First Nations Asserted Claim Of BAND LAND ?
Custom & Tradition (International Law & Indigenous Turtle Islands On Vancouver Island) : Recognition Of Property Rights At European Courts (Utrecht) : BICKLE PROPERTY RIGHTS Have Not Knowingly Been SURRENDERED
BICKLE FAMILY Has CIVIL RIGHT OF CLAIM

"The right of access is not a personal right, rather the right of access is attached to the property and is granted in perpetuity when the land is subdivided.
1. When access is over Band land, a Band Council Resolution (BCR) agreeing to the access and giving its approximate location is required except where it is identified as a road.
2. Subject to Preparation of the Instrument, when new parcels are being created by the subdivision of an "existing land-locked parcel" (e.g., a parcel which was land-locked prior to January 1, 1989), all new parcels must have access to the point of entry of the original land-locked parcel, and a witnessed agreement signed by each Band member who holds an interest in any of the new parcels must be provided accepting lawful possession under these conditions. (See Acceptance Agreement For Lawful Possession Of Land-Locked Parcel.)"
3. SNUNEYMUXW FN BAND LANDS : BC & SNUNEYMUXW LAND TRANSFER AGREEMENT 2020 : TRUST AGREEMENT : STAGE 4 TREATY STATUS : BC TREATY COMMISSION (TREATY STATUS ACROSS BC) - SNUNEYMUXW 2022 STATUS - Stage 2 : Tripartite Reconciliation.
4. CANADA "Band Land" REFERENCES : OVERVIEW :

THESE REFERENCES Substantiate The Above & Following Brief Notes

ETC 2 3 4 5 as related to the void Hudson's Bay Company Charter Fitzgerald Examinations / Examine : 1613 : Yuquot : BC : Utrecht

Standing Authority Of The Parties : The Evolution Of Custom And Tradition In The Snuneymuwx Territory Since The Creation Of Humans On Earth : ANCESTRAL HISTORY :

(A) The BICKLE Family Land Dispute Is Between Elizabeth II, Queen Of Canada

(B) BICKLE Family Members Kathy And Cecil Are Hereditary Monarchs (Head Persons Or Chiefs) : Kathy & Cecil Share The Title HEAD OF STATE (Your Family Territory)

(C) Elizabeth II Is HEAD Of STATE Canada & Head Of State United Kingdom (England) - Her Windsor Family Is Actually Named Saxe Coburg Und Gotha (German Ancestry)

In The Beginning Of Time The BICKLE Family Ancestors Came Down Upon Earth And Settled On The West Coast Of Turtle Island North - Now, Canada North Of 49th //
Today, In 2022 The BICKLE Family Continues To Honour Custom And Tradition - Including Ancestral Laws - Like Potlatch (Sharing Of Wealth)
And, Today Crown Canada (Elizabeth II - All Canada Land Is Held Under Her Title - Claims To Possess Governing Authority In The Snuneymuxw Territories
In 1788, The European Court Called UTRECHT Court Settled A Dispute Between England's King George III & Spain's King Charles III Regarding A 100-Acre Land Dispute Of Turtle Island West Coast At Nootka Sound's Friendly Cove : The Utrecht Court Decided That Geo III Owned That 100 Friendly Cove Acres; And, That Charles III Must Pay Geo III 300,000 Coins For Having Trespassed Upon That 100 Acres - Seizing The Ship & Property From Geo III's Captain Meares
Hence, With This Utrecht Court Decision (Accepted By All Western European Nation Members) It Was SET LAW That Indigenous Peoples Of Turtle Island OWNED Land - With The Authority To Sell, Lease & Tax : Chiefs Maquilla & Calicum Had SOLD That 100 Acres To England's III Through Captain Meares
In The ( 1600 - 1900) Period Of English Colonization (Theft By Fraud) Of Vancouver Island, England's Colonial Offices Entered Into A Contract With Hudson's Bay Company Factor DOUGLAS - Assigning Him The Duty To Create TREATIES With The "Vancouver Island" Indigenous Peoples - DOUGLAS Proceeded To Creates 14 TREATIES - Including, The Treaty With SNUNEYMUX Peoples
These DOUGLAS TREATIES Fail Due To ABSENCE Of LEGAL AUTHORITY To Enter Into CONTRACT (Treaty) - BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY RECORDS Reveal That The English King Charles II 1670 Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) Charter FAILED To Achieve Parliamentary Endorsement In 1696 - There Were Several Reviews Of The Scandalous HBC Practices In Negotiating With Indigenous Peoples
THEREFORE, The 1854 HBC DOUGLAS Treaty With SNUNEYMUXW Peoples FAILED TO ACHIEVE LEGAL WEIGHT : Contracts Are Binding Where Both Parties Have LEGAL CAPACITY To Enter Into The Binding Contract
CANADA Purchased HBC Land Titles (Including, Vancouver Island Territories In Circa 1867 For About $300,000
The Snuneymuxw Chief Who Entered That 1854 Blank Paper Treaty With His "X" Later (When Receiving The Treaty Wording Disputed The Terms (Suneymuxw Records)

THEREFORE, TODAY (2022) Where SNUNEYMUXW Band Office Informs CHIEFS KATHY & CECIL BICKLE That The BICKLE Family Territories Are NOW "BAND LAND :

What Legal Tests Should Be Assigned To This Snuneymuxw First Nations Band Claim ?
FIRST, What Evidence Exists That The Ancestral BICKLE Territories Have Been Transitioned Into BAND LAND - And - What COMPENSATION Has Been Offered & Agreed Upon ?
WHOSE Law Prevailed In The Transition Of BICKLE Lands Into CROWN CANADA Band Lands ?
Have The Chiefs (Queen & King - Absolute Monarchs) KATHY & CECIL Agreed To Transitioning Of Their FAMILY ESTATE ?
What CONTRACT Exists As Evidence Of A LEGAL AGREEMENT ( English Common Law & Traditional Snuneymuxw Peoples Laws) ?

SUMMARY : How To RESOLVE This BICKLE vs CROWN CANADA @ SUNEYMUXW LAND TITLE Dispute

Crown Canada Court's Are Biased In Favour Of Elizabeth II - Queen Of Canada (Her COURT) - Judges & Lawyers Are Compelled To Obey CROWN Canada Law
CHIEFS KATHY & CECIL BICKLE Can Implement Precedence (Custom & International) By Applying To International Tribunals For An ENFORCEABLE Resolution : The 2009 HTG vs Canada At The IACHR (Inter-American Commission On Human Rights) Established Binding Precedence That Recognizes The BICKLE Right To Pursue Legal Resolution At International Tribunals : I.E., The United Nations Security Council Can Approve The BICKLE Application To The ICJ (International Court Of Justice) & The ICC ( International Criminal Court) : Both Can Settle CIVIL DISPUTES : The Canada Assertion Of Jurisdiction At Snuneymuxw Might Be Considered To Breach International Maritime Law Of Piracy

RESPONDING TO THE SNUNEYMUXW Email Asserting Jurisdiction Through Claim Of BAND LAND